Issue 25, 2017

ISSN 2415-3206 (Print)

Management, 2017, 25: 80–87

URI http://en.menagement.knutd.edu.ua/80-87-25-2017

JEL Classification: F210

UDC: 330.341.1:3

M. SHKODA

Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design, Ukraine

INSTITUTIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF SOCIO- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TO REGIONS IN UKRAINE

Language: English

Introduction and purpose of the research: An important stage in the preparation of measures to improve the institutional environment in the region is the assessment of the relationship between the establishedі іnstitutions and economic effects derived from their implementation and functioning.

Hypothesis of scientific research. Understanding the importance of the development of small and medium-sized businesses by the country’s leadership has attracted the formation of goals and principles of state policy in the field of small and medium-sized businesses. Development of the Institute entrepreneurship is one of the priority directions of development of the Ukrainian economy, in particular its regions. The purpose of the study. It is the development of methodological tools for assessing the impact of entrepreneurs on socio-economic development of the region and its testing.

Research methods: during the research used retrospective, logical, systemic and complex analysis, the method of typology construction, classification, as well as specific methods. Research in the field of institutional analysis and regional economics.

Results: development of methodological evaluation tools influence of institutions on the socio-economic development of regions, allowed to conclude that the Dnipropetrovsk, Transcarpathian, Zhytomyr and Lviv regions in the pre-crisis period were identical in status institutional environment and socio- economic development. But due to different institutional policies of the regions, they become more alternative to each other.

Conclusions: using the proposed methodology in the regions showed that, despite the high degree of similarity institutional environment and the dynamics of socio-economic development, the economy of the regions in different ways reacted to the negative impact caused by the crisis. It found reflection in the change in the values of the similarity coefficients institutional environment and the dynamics of socio- economic development regions. This technique allows us to determine the dependence of dynamics socio-economic development of the region from its institutional environment.

Keywords: institute of entrepreneurial activity, entrepreneurial environment, entrepreneurial coefficient of similarity, entrepreneurial activity, crisis.

References

  1. Ajrapetyan, M. S. (2009). Zarubezhnuj oput ispolzovanyya gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva [Foreign experience in the use of public-private partnership]. Gosudarstvennaya vlasti mestnoe samoupravlenie, Vol. 2, Pp. 67–69 [in Russian].
  2. Aghion, P., Howitt, P. (1992). A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction. Econometrica, Vol. 60, P. 323.
  3. Pro derzhavno-pryvatne partnerstvo: Zakon Ukrainy [On Public-Private Partnership: Law of Ukraine No. 2404-VI dated July 1, 2010]. Liga Zakon. Retrieved from: http://www.liga.net.
  4. Pro zasady derzhavnoi rehuliatornoi polityky u sferi hospodarskoi diialnosti: Zakon Ukrainy [On the Principles of State Regulatory Policy in the Field of Economic Activity: Law of Ukraine of 11.09.2003 No. 1160-IV]. zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua.
  5. Brusser, P.A. (2013). Finansovye modeli i osnovnye finansovye instrumenty GChP [Financial models and main financial instruments of GCP]. 400 p. [in Russian].
  6. Galchinsky, A.S. et al. (2002). Innovatsiina stratehiia ukrainskykh reform [Innovative Strategy of Ukrainian Reforms]. Kyiv: Znannya Ukraini. 336 p. [in Ukrainian].
  7. Yermoshenko, M.M., Ganushchak-Yefimenko, L.M. (2010). Mekhanizm rozvytku innovatsiinoho potentsialu klasteroobiednanykh pidpryiemstv: monohrafiia [Mechanism of development of innovative potential of cluster-united enterprises: Monograph]. Kyiv: National Academy of Management. 236 p. [in Ukrainian].
  8. North, D. (2010). Ponimanie protcessa ekono- micheskikh izmenenii [Understanding the process of economic change]. Per. With English. Moscow: Higher School of Economics. 256 p. [in Russian].
  9. Ofitsiinyi sait Derzhavnoi sluzhby statystyky Ukrainy [Official site of the State Statistics Service of Ukraine]. www.ukrstat.gov.ua. Retrieved from: https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua [in Ukrainian].
  10. Yermoshenko, M.M., Yerokhin, S.A., Shandra, V.M. et al. (2008). Orhanizatsiino-ekonomichni aspekty innovatsiinoho onovlennia natsionalnoho hospodarstva [Organizational and Economic Aspects of Innovative Modernization of the National Econo- my: Sciences. Monogr.]. Eds. sciences M.M Yermo- shenko and S.A. Yerokhin. Kyiv: National Academy of Management. 213 p. [in Ukrainian].
  11. Vorotina, L.I. et al. (2007). Udoskonalennia rehuliatornoho seredovyshcha yak peredumova dlia zaluchennia investytsii v ekonomiku Ukrainy: materialy Kruhloho stolu [Improvement of the regulatory environment as a prerequisite for attracting investments into the Ukrainian economy: Materials of the Round Table]. Kyiv: European University. 132 p. [in Ukrainian].
  12. Shumpeter, Y.A. (2008). Teoriia ekonomi- cheskogo razvitiia. Kapitalizm, sotcializm, demok- ratiia [Theory of Economic Development. Capitalism, Socialism, Democracy]. Moscow: Exmo-Press. 864 p. [in Russian].

Full text   pdf

Reference to this article:

Shkoda, M. (2017). Institutional implementation of socio- economic development to regions in Ukraine. Management, 25: 80–87